approximately 5 minutes 2,997 views at time of posting
approximately 5 minutes 2,997 views at time of posting
The WordPress.com stats worker bees prepared a 2015 annual report for R3publicans.
Here’s an excerpt:
The concert hall at the Sydney Opera House holds 2,700 people. This blog was viewed about 42,000 times in 2015. If it were a concert at Sydney Opera House, it would take about 16 sold-out performances for that many people to see it.
“The good news is your government is open,” the Republican presidential candidate told members of the Greater Derry-Londonderry Chamber of Commerce.
“The bad news is your government is open.”
Civil Asset Forfeiture legislation needs to be reformed in order to protect innocent people from having their property subject to legal theft by the state without due process. R3publicans (R3s) are working to help Oklahomans learn about this issue and what they can do to help reform the current law. The senate author of the bill to reform Civil Asset Forfeiture law in OK (SB-838) is Senator Kyle Loveless. Our hope is that public support for reform will be strong enough to ensure that this bill is heard in the upcoming legislative session and ultimately passed and signed into law. Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform is an issue everyone can get behind regardless of political leaning.
Handout includes several counties and the amount confiscated and kept over recent years. It also include a Washington Post op ed on topic.This information is for sharing with friends, family, neighbors, and elected officials. Please let your representatives know your thoughts on the matter.
Civil Asset Forfeiture Handout via Senator Kyle Loveless in Oklahoma shared by Sandra Crosnoe (Handout embedded below; follow link if embed fails to work properly)
Handout on Civil Asset Forfeiture (SB 838) authored by Kyle Loveless – lots of very useful information on topic. R3publicans has endorsed this bill. #R3s Please share! #4life #4liberty #dueprocess
In a recent WSJ article by Nick Timiraos – House Votes to Reauthorize U.S. Export-Import Bank – WSJ writes:
WASHINGTON—The House Tuesday approved the reauthorization of the U.S. Export-Import Bank, with a majority of Republicans joining almost all Democrats to demonstrate a broad bipartisan coalition to revive the export-finance agency.
The measure passed 313-118.
More than half of the House’s 247 Republicans—127 in all—voted to renew the bank’s charter. Three years ago, 147 out of 242 backed it.
Leading up to this vote, I received several interesting pros and cons on the matter. That in and of itself is not unusual, but who was on what side was most surprising. Congressman Bridenstine, my congressman, usually for smaller, government justified his support of the matter as ‘national security’. Hmmmm, the great catchall for more government like the unpatriotic Patriot Act?!
Here is a quote from his article (full text here) “While the Ex-Im Bank was not created for national security purposes, it has enabled development of domestic, commercial industries – from satellite communications to ships – essential to U.S. national security. Strong support for domestic defense-related manufacturing capabilities is desperately needed at a time when the defense budget is inadequate to confront international threats.” To which I said, “[I] totally disagree with you on this one, the Ex-Im Bank needs to die a natural death and reduce the cost of government a little while reducing crony government handouts to big business a lot! Let the free market work please…”
Paul Ryan, the new Speaker of the House, surprisingly (to me anyway) went on record lambasting the reathorization as crony capitalism (full text here) saying, “”I think there are plenty other ways to expand opportunity in this country, and corporate welfare is not one of them. The biggest beneficiaries of this bank, two-thirds of their money go to 10 companies. Forty percent goes to one company. And this bank does cost money—just ask the Congressional Budget Office when they use real scorekeeping. Remember Fannie Mae? Remember their accounting? Remember when they told us they weren’t going to cost any money—until they did? And it cost us billions.”
Several years ago Ron Paul warned us of this matter (link via my good friend J Bradley Jansen and you can see his remarks here: Center for Financial Privacy and Human Rights » Rep. Ron Paul’s Statement on H.R. 1370 Reauthorizing the Export Import Bank (1997). In this report, Ron Paul says, “H.R. 1370, reauthorizing the Export-Import Bank, should be rejected for several reasons. The claim to constitutionality is dubious. The Bank rewards special interest groups with political favors. Reallocating money from the job-producing, productive sectors of the economy to the less efficient sectors distorts credit allocation. Reauthorization of the Bank is both bad economics and bad politics.”
There is a lot more history on reauthorizations through recent years here in Capitol Words. Check out the right side bar and follow the path of recent reauthorizations. When will we find enough Congressman/women to put a stop to this nonsense?
Recently,Congressman Thomas Massie had this to say on facebook, “What is the Ex-Im bank? In a nutshell: Congress set up a program for the US government to guarantee loans for foreign companies to buy American products. The goal is to improve the export market for American companies. Doesn’t sound too bad until you consider (1) the arrangement primarily benefits a single corporation (2) this hurts some American companies, like domestic airlines that compete with foreign airlines whose airplane purchases we’ve subsidized using Ex-Im bank (3) if the foreign companies fail, Americans will be bailing them out with the loan guarantees. In my opinion, this is not the proper role of the US government. I do not plan to vote to re-authorize Ex-Im bank. Because the Ex-Im bank is not widely supported by congressmen, there is talk that the Ex-Im bank will be reauthorized by attaching it to unrelated must-pass legislation….
The Export Import bank is crony capitalism and I oppose its reauthorization. Some argue that the Ex-Im bank makes money, but so did Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac until the day they didn’t. Proponents of the Ex-Im bank neglect to mention that American taxpayers are on the hook for loan guarantees if the foreign entities default.
When our government picks winners, it inevitably causes others to lose. For instance, Ex-Im subsidizes new airplane purchases for Air India. Consequently our domestic airlines lose international routes. The end result is that pilots and crew members in Kentucky lose their jobs. What sounds like a well intended program, with benefits for some, has negative consequences for my constituents. The free market is better suited for determining which companies should receive capital investment.”
And if that were not enough, here is one more article with lots of very interesting comments:
The Export-Import Bank Story the Post-Dispatch Refused to Print | Hennessy’s View opens saying, “Huge multi-national corporations like to preach from the “small business” bible when it comes to the Export-Import bank. Unfortunately, most of the Ex-Im propaganda about how “small business” benefits crumbles under scrutiny.” He goes on to explain that the Ex-Im definition of “a small business has up to 1,500 employee and revenue of $21 million. So the Ex-Im idea of small is relative.” The points made in the article continue in the comments.
So it looks like it will be renewed for another 7 years. Can we as a nation last that long? I hope so. Time will tell.
From Real Independent News & Film: “Have the elite warned us that November 3rd and November 5th will be particularly important dates? The Economist has very close ties to the Rothschild banking dynasty of Europe, and it has been a well-known mouthpiece for the global elite for decades. That is why all of the weird imagery that was used on the cover of the January 2015 issue made so many headlines when it first came out. The elite often like to foreshadow what they intend to do in advance, and many were trying to decipher what many of the cryptic symbols might mean. For those that have not seen it yet, here is the full cover…”
As you can see President Obama is clearly in front, with a Cheshire cat near his left leg. A little girl who made me think of Alice in Wonderland looks up at the scene of world leaders. The symbols are scattered around and in some of the leaders hands or on their heads. The part of the picture getting attention now is the arrows near the front with 11.3 and 11.5 on them. Speculation is that these dates (if they are that closely connect to the dates when US reaches the debt ceiling (again). No biggie right?! Here is an enlargement of that part of the cover.
Spiderman seems to be falling and a mushroom cloud goes off in the background. The man in the moon has two faces and a drone flies overhead – or is it something else? Notable on the left is the Pied Piper playing his flute while everyone looks in another direction. The football looks like a globe mounted ready for the kickoff. I am fascinated by many things each time I look – especially the turtle with emphasis marks above him front and center.
More links and info on topic:
Vote here: http://www.drudgereport.com/now.htm
Results as of ~6AM CST August 7, 2015
http://www.livenewschat.eu/the-republican-debates-live-stream/ potentially a live stream for debates tonight – check it out #R3s #CLCs #4life #4liberty #GOP
WARNING: Heavy mind games going on to ‘help’ you reach the ‘right’ answer. Watch with your eyes wide open and listen to what is not said and who is not featured and promoted as much as who is!
Here is the most up-to-date and complete schedule we have for the 2015 / 2016 Republican Primary debates. These debates are between all the Republican candidates running for President.
Tickets: See this page for ticketing information.
Each of these debates has been officially sanctioned by the Republican National Committee. Details will be added/updated as they become available as well as live streams.
Democrats Cartoon Republican Candidates for Debate Watch Parties (photo credit: DonkeyHotey)
[Editor’s Note: Pay attention to the media games to focus on ‘their’ picks and avoid certain candidates in their coverage — once you can see through the game, the selection process for the REAL grassroots candidates gets much easier.]
The Mises Institute is a nonprofit organization. Contributions are tax-deductible to the full extent of the law.
This flyer was received in an email to Sandra Crosnoe on July 14th. If you are interested in helping organize a group trip from Oklahoma, please let her know ASAP!
Let’s figure out a thousand ways to bless this great gentleman and champion of the constitution for a very special birthday celebration.