Tag Archives: states rights

Clouds over America Conference in OKC February 8-9

For a report from the Clouds over America Conference in OKC 2013 via Gary Kilpatrick please visit OKGrassroots here >>>

Clouds over America OK 2013

CurryClouds13 AD (pdf format to download complete flyer for event details)

Featuring:

Nathan Dahm – State Senator on Sound Money

Jon Echols – State Rep on Surveillance & Facial ID

Dan Fisher – State Rep on States Rights

Hon Sterling Lacy on Beating Discouragement with Hope

Kevin McAfee on Hollywood vs Morality

Dr Duke Pesta on Freedom Project and University Ugly

Pastor Paul Blair on Candidate Experience

Bob Donohoo on Strategic Activism

Tim Gillespie on OK Gun Legislation

Charlie Meadows on The State Chamber Has Changed

Jenni White on Common Core Curriculum

For more information call 405-348-9991

Note:  There is a fee to attend (see pdf flyer for details)

Conference sponsored by Oklahoma Conservative PAC,

Oklahoma Chapters of The John Birch Society

and Reclaiming America for Christ

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for 

Finding Gems & Sharing Them and OKGrassroots

Michael Shaw on Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development: Behind the Green Mask Video

In case you have not been to a local presentation and heard Michael Shaw of Freedom Advocates in person, here is a youtube presentation from 2011 which is indexed topically so you can go directly to the section of interest.  The entire video is about 1 hour in length.  Special thanks to a friend for the link!

Stop Agenda 21 in your community.  Share this link with a friend.

“JUMP TO” important parts of the video by selecting “SHOW MORE” below.

Chapter markers (click the link to jump to topic)
00:00 Conference Opening
01:42 Introduction: Rosa Koire
02:53 Presentation: Michael Shaw
07:19 A comprehensive Plan of action
07:53 Johannesburg Summit 2002
09:04 Global to Local
09:37 Santa Cruz County
10:38 Global Biodiversity Assessment
13:46 Warm and Fuzzy terms
15:35 Sustainable Development
18:06 The Contemporary Dialectic
19:30 Which Philosophy of Rights?
23:11 Principles
29:53 Map
31:40 U.N. Quote
33:58 NARC
35:45 What is a Metropolitan Planning Organization
37:22 CALCOG
39:21 What does Soviet mean?
40:38 California Regional Progress Report
42:06 ICLEI
47:14 The Super Highway

This video was recorded at Rosa Koire’s conference on Agenda 21, “Behind the Green Mask”, August 6, 2011 in Santa Rosa California.

Agenda 21 is the Master Plan put forth by the United Nations in 1992 and adopted by President Bill Clinton. Agenda 21 is a green initiative with targets cars and people living away from cities who must commute. Their goal is to develop large, congested city centers for people to reside, and provide mass transit for the city dwellers to commute to work. It also targets large parcels of land in the world, including the United States, to be redistricted to “open space land”, thereby making it undevelopable.

Agenda 21 is now being adopted in California, specifically in the San Francisco Bay Area, under the name “Plan Bay Area”. Plan Bay Area’s goal is to develop large congested downtown metro areas, with shops, stores, theaters, and mass high rise housing. They aim to get people out of their private suburban residences and cars, and warehouse them in these large metro areas. These areas will also house California’s large immigrant population, including illegal immigrants.

Video Produced by Steve Kemp, Golden Gate Minutemen and Bay Area Tea Parties.

For more information from Michael Shaw visit Freedom Advocates here >>>

Posted by Sandra Crosnoe for R3publicans

Gag me with a spoon – UN gives advice to AZ now

It is really time to get the UN out of the US.  I mean this is over the top.  Every hard working citizen trying to make ends meet and pay their own bills has had just about enough.   We have given to other nations via government transfers, charitable programs, volunteer efforts, church missions and humanitarian aid.

Here’s a bit of the article and you can click on the pic for more.

Click on pic for more of the original article

We have asked nicely that you respect our borders and our laws.  What part of rule of law, protecting our borders, ethical standards, not stealing from others, not taking advantage of others, protecting our sovereignty, moral values, and common courtesy do illegal aliens not understand?

We stand with Arizonans in putting their foot down and doing what the federal government has failed to do since 911 (and well before!).  The first thing that must happen is to secure our borders.  The second thing that must happen is to remove economic incentives for industries to hire illegal aliens.  The third thing that must happen is to forcibly remove anyone caught violating our immigration laws.  No sanctuary cities, no free medical, no checks in the mail to mailboxes just across the border.

In addition we will not penalize citizens for the failures of the federal government.  It is not citizens who must carry papers but visitors and guests here with our permission.  All others should be sent home at their own expense asap.

Enough is enough.


PS  You can forget about amnesty too –

not on our watch and certainly not to lawbreakers!

Census Questions for All

Have you gotten your census questions in the mail?

Have you thought at all about federal government intrusion in your life at any level lately?  Well here is a little microcosm of the macrocosm of the problem of big government.  It brings up all the questions about what questions do ‘they’ have a right to ask, and what questions are necessary for the census and what your rights are in the process.

What does the Constitution say?

First let’s examine what the constitution says about the census which is found in Article I, Section 2, Clause 3.

Article. I.

Section. 2.

Clause 3: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons. (See Note 2) The actual Enumeration shall be made within three Years after the first Meeting of the Congress of the United States, and within every subsequent Term of ten Years, in such Manner as they shall by Law direct. The Number of Representatives shall not exceed one for every thirty Thousand, but each State shall have at Least one Representative; and until such enumeration shall be made, the State of New Hampshire shall be entitled to chuse three, Massachusetts eight, Rhode-Island and Providence Plantations one, Connecticut five, New-York six, New Jersey four, Pennsylvania eight, Delaware one, Maryland six, Virginia ten, North Carolina five, South Carolina five, and Georgia three.

Note 2: The part of this Clause relating to the mode of apportionment of representatives among the several States has been affected by Section 2 of amendment XIV, and as to taxes on incomes without apportionment by amendment XVI.

________________________

What powers are reserved?

It seems worth mentioning here that powers not delegated are retained by the states and the people respectively, but then we all know about the tenth amendment right?  Here it is for reference just in case you need to refresh your memory.  It is a very hot topic these days in our state houses!

Article [X.]

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

So then the question arises did Congress pass any laws about the Census questions and what is proper to ask and what is required to answer if anything and what are the penalties related to same?

Thinking out loud here it seems that anyone can ask anything they want any time they want.  The necessary information for a census is how many people live at the residence.  But what about citizenship and visitors from foreign countries you might ask.  And what if not everyone answers the form the same way.  And what if now we are setting population numbers and apportionment based on illegal aliens among us?  All because we simply cannot bring ourselves to control our borders and insist that those coming here do so legally.  Surely no one would list illegals on a census – would they?

What are the requirements on those of us here legally?

What does the Census ask?

This link provides a look at 10 questions for all households to complete by mail.  Many of these questions are troubling for many reasons.

An Oklahoma state representative, Sally Kern has said this on her website in an article entitled “Remember, no matter what they ask, you really only need to tell them how many people live at your address.”

What does the Census say about legal requirements?

According to Title 13, Section 221 (Census, Refusal or neglect to answer questions; false answers) of the United States Code, persons who fail or refuse to respond to the mail-back census form, or refuse to respond to a follow-up census taker can be fined up to $100. Persons who knowingly provide false information to the census can be fined up to $500.

Additional Constitutional Issues to Ponder:

Equal Protection Clause

“nor deny any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws”

Amendment IV
Unreasonable search and seizure

Amendment V
Due process, right to not incriminate

Summary

In an ever so general summation, remember that our unalienable rights must be exercised to be retained.  It is easy to fall into the trap of the path of least resistance when dealing with these matters.  Please prayerfully ponder the questions to answer and the right thing to do as you complete the census form and return it.  Be wise as serpents and gentle as doves if you should have to deal with a follow-up visit.  If you didn’t give them a phone number or you don’t have a land line, then phone call intrusions will not be possible.  Answer wisely and prayerfully and protect your family and your privacy in the midst of an information hungry society.

One final thought on privacy is that although people collecting information often guarantee  confidentiality, that is a hard promise to deliver on because of the easy migration of data and information these days.  So the less information public entities have on you, the less privacy anyone can violate willfully or unwittingly.

Where do you draw the line?

Comments and discussion are encouraged on this topic as always.  Please provide links and references to additional information.   Every head of household will have to decide how to handle this matter in the next few weeks!

Brogdon Opposes Presidential Council of Governors

BROGDON OPPOSES PRESIDENTIAL COUNCIL OF GOVERNORS

OWASSO, OK – Gubernatorial candidate state Senator Randy Brogdon (R-Owasso) today announced his adamant opposition to the Obama administration’s Council of Governors.

“This power grab eliminates the lines between federal and state authority,” Brogdon said. “This move by the administration undoubtedly violates our Tenth Amendment rights as a state.”

The establishment of the Council was directed by the 110th Congress in 2008 by the enactment of Public Law 110–181, Section 1822. However, an executive order was signed by President Obama on the 11th of January to initiate the action.

The Council of Governors, according to the White House web site, will consist of ten governors selected by the President and will work directly with federal military and security agencies on military activities within the United States.

“As governor I would never sit idly by and allow the federal government to usurp power clearly delegated to the State of Oklahoma,” Brogdon said.

Brogdon, a longtime defender of states’ Tenth Amendment rights, called on Oklahoma Governor Brad Henry to boycott the Council if called upon, and immediately denounce any further intrusive action on the citizens of this state.

“This is an opportunity for us as a free people to stand up and stand strong for the protection of our freedoms,” Brogdon concluded.

END

Randy Brogdon Against Power Grab Video